Hogan Assessment: Complete Guide to HPI, HDS & MVPI
The complete guide to Hogan Assessments — what HPI, HDS, and MVPI measure, how employers use Hogan in hiring and leadership selection, and how to approach each questionnaire.
What Are Hogan Assessments?
Hogan Assessments is a US-based psychometric publisher founded in 1987 by Robert Hogan and Joyce Hogan. Robert Hogan was a pioneering personality psychologist who argued that personality tests could validly predict workplace performance — at a time when this was controversial. His research built on the Five-Factor (Big Five) model of personality, extended with a focus on leadership effectiveness and derailment.
Today, Hogan is one of the most scientifically respected personality assessment publishers in the world. Its instruments are used by Fortune 500 companies, multinational financial institutions, military and government agencies, and executive search firms across more than 50 countries. Hogan assessments appear most frequently in:
- Leadership selection — senior management, director, and C-suite roles
- Graduate and professional hiring — particularly in financial services, energy, and consulting
- High-stakes roles — public safety, aviation, healthcare, military officer selection
- Succession planning and development — identifying high-potential employees and their development areas
Robert Hogan's foundational claim — that personality genuinely predicts job performance — has been extensively validated. Hogan's instruments have one of the largest published validity databases of any personality assessment tool. This is relevant to candidates: because Hogan scores correlate with actual performance, employers take them seriously, and understanding what each scale measures helps you understand what the employer is looking for.
HPI — Hogan Personality Inventory
The Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI) measures normal, bright-side personality — how you typically behave when you're at your best and seeking to make a positive impression on others. It is based on the Five-Factor (Big Five) model and consists of 7 primary scales and 42 subscales. The HPI typically takes 15–20 minutes to complete (206 true/false items).
| Scale | What It Measures | High Scorer Traits | Low Scorer Traits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adjustment | Emotional stability and self-confidence | Calm, resilient, handles criticism well | Anxious, self-critical, volatile under pressure |
| Ambition | Initiative, leadership drive, competitive energy | Goal-oriented, confident, assertive | Passive, risk-averse, less leadership drive |
| Sociability | Enjoyment of social interaction and visibility | Outgoing, talkative, socially energised | Quiet, private, prefers smaller groups |
| Interpersonal Sensitivity | Empathy, warmth, tactfulness | Perceptive, diplomatic, relationship-focused | Frank, direct, less attuned to social cues |
| Prudence | Self-discipline, conscientiousness, rule-following | Reliable, detail-oriented, organised | Flexible, unconventional, sometimes impulsive |
| Inquisitive | Intellectual curiosity, creativity, strategic thinking | Innovative, visionary, conceptual thinker | Practical, concrete, prefers established methods |
| Learning Approach | Interest in learning and formal education | Academic orientation, enjoys development | Experience-focused, less interest in formal learning |
Scores are reported as percentiles relative to a norm group (typically working adults or a sector-specific sample). There is no single "ideal" profile — employers look for specific combinations that fit the role's demands. A role requiring independent analysis and creative strategy (e.g. R&D, consulting) values high Inquisitive. A role requiring rule compliance and accuracy (e.g. audit, finance control) values high Prudence.
HDS — Hogan Development Survey (Derailers)
The Hogan Development Survey (HDS) is the most distinctive and counterintuitive of the three Hogan instruments. Rather than measuring positive personality strengths, it measures personality risks — the overuse of strengths under stress that can derail careers and relationships. These "derailers" are typically not visible in normal performance but emerge when individuals are under pressure, tired, or feel secure enough to relax their guard.
The HDS has 11 scales, each corresponding to a personality risk pattern. A high score on an HDS scale means the risk is salient — the behaviour described by that scale is likely to emerge under stress. The HDS typically takes 15–20 minutes (170 true/false items).
| Derailer Scale | Under Stress, This Person… | Career Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Excitable | Becomes moody, volatile, and easily disappointed | Seen as unpredictable; alienates teams |
| Skeptical | Becomes cynical, suspicious, and challenging | Seen as difficult; resists decisions |
| Cautious | Becomes risk-averse, indecisive, and fearful of failure | Seen as lacking courage; avoids accountability |
| Reserved | Withdraws, becomes uncommunicative and aloof | Seen as unapproachable; fails to inspire teams |
| Leisurely | Becomes passive-aggressive, resentful, and slow to act | Seen as resistant; appears cooperative but isn't |
| Bold | Becomes arrogant, overconfident, and unwilling to admit errors | Seen as entitled; stops learning and listening |
| Mischievous | Takes unnecessary risks, bends rules, manipulates | Seen as untrustworthy; creates ethical risks |
| Colorful | Seeks attention, becomes dramatic and impulsive | Seen as self-promoting; poor team player |
| Imaginative | Pursues unconventional ideas at the expense of practicality | Seen as out of touch; poor execution |
| Diligent | Becomes perfectionistic, micromanaging, and critical | Seen as controlling; slows teams down |
| Dutiful | Becomes overly compliant, eager to please, avoids disagreement | Seen as lacking conviction; fails to challenge up |
High Bold individuals are often charismatic leaders — until they stop listening to feedback. High Diligent individuals are often thorough and reliable — until perfectionism slows the team. The HDS doesn't measure weakness; it measures where your strengths could become problematic. In a feedback debrief, employers use HDS data to identify development priorities, not to exclude candidates for having a high score on one scale.
MVPI — Motives, Values & Preferences Inventory
The Motives, Values, Preferences Inventory (MVPI) measures what a person fundamentally wants and values — what motivates them, what kind of culture they thrive in, and what goals drive their decisions. Unlike the HPI (which predicts performance) or HDS (which identifies risks), the MVPI predicts engagement and cultural fit. A technically excellent hire who values autonomy will disengage in a highly controlled environment; the MVPI helps predict this mismatch.
The MVPI has 10 value scales, each approximately 15 items. The full instrument takes 15–20 minutes.
| Value Scale | What It Captures | Thrives In… |
|---|---|---|
| Recognition | Desire for attention, status, and public acknowledgement | High-profile roles, client-facing, public platforms |
| Power | Desire for control, authority, and influence over others | Leadership roles, decision-making environments |
| Hedonism | Enjoyment of pleasure, fun, and spontaneity | Creative, dynamic, social work environments |
| Altruistic | Desire to help and serve others | Public service, NGO, healthcare, education |
| Affiliation | Need for social connection and belonging | Collaborative team environments, social cultures |
| Tradition | Respect for convention, rules, and established ways | Regulated industries, structured organisations |
| Security | Need for predictability, stability, and structure | Stable industries, clear processes, risk-averse environments |
| Commerce | Interest in money, profit, and commercial outcomes | Sales, trading, business development, entrepreneurial settings |
| Aesthetics | Appreciation for beauty, design, and form | Creative industries, design, brand, architecture |
| Science | Interest in data, logic, and empirical thinking | R&D, analytics, finance, quantitative roles |
Which Companies Use Hogan Assessments?
Hogan assessments appear across industries globally, but are especially prevalent in financial services, oil & gas, professional services, aviation, and public safety. In the UK and US, major investment banks, consulting firms, and large corporates routinely include Hogan instruments in their leadership pipeline and senior hiring processes. Some also use Hogan for graduate and early-career programmes where leadership potential is being assessed.
At graduate and early-career entry, employers more commonly use SHL's OPQ32 or Saville's Wave for personality assessment. Hogan assessments become more prevalent for experienced professional hiring, management roles, and leadership development. If you're applying for a graduate position and receive a Hogan assessment, the employer is taking leadership potential particularly seriously — this is a positive sign for the role's trajectory.
Hogan vs OPQ32 vs Big Five
| Feature | Hogan (HPI/HDS/MVPI) | SHL OPQ32 | Big Five (NEO-PI-R) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical basis | Socioanalytic theory; evolutionary psychology | Occupational competency framework | Factor-analytic Big Five model |
| Unique feature | HDS derailer measurement (dark side) | 32 work-relevant personality dimensions | Research-grade; NEO is the most cited in academia |
| Primary use case | Leadership selection, high-stakes hiring, development | Broad occupational screening, all levels | Research; clinical; sometimes graduate screening |
| Format | True/False; separate instruments per construct | Ipsative triads (most/least like me) | Normative 5-point rating scale |
| Completion time | 15–20 min per instrument; 45–60 min for all three | 25–35 min (OPQ32) | 35–45 min (full NEO) |
| Fakability | Lower — True/False less transparent than rating scales | Low — ipsative format limits social desirability bias | Higher — Likert ratings more transparent |
For candidates who have faced SHL's OPQ32, the Hogan HPI will feel different — True/False rather than forced-choice triads — but the underlying task is the same: respond honestly about your typical work behaviours. The Hogan HDS is genuinely unique; no other major publisher has a direct equivalent to its derailer-focused approach.
How Hogan Scores Are Used in Hiring
Hogan assessments are rarely used as standalone pass/fail filters in the way that aptitude tests are. Instead, they inform the overall assessment picture alongside interviews, cognitive tests, and work samples. Here is how they typically function:
- Profile matching: Employers define a "success profile" for the role based on data from high performers. Your HPI profile is compared to this success profile. A close match increases your likelihood of progression.
- Interview question generation: HDS derailer scores flag potential risks that interviewers probe specifically. If your HDS flags Bold (arrogance risk), you may be asked "Tell me about a time you received difficult feedback" — the interviewer is testing whether the risk is mitigated by self-awareness.
- Cultural fit assessment (MVPI): Your MVPI values profile is compared to the organisation's culture profile. A candidate who scores very high on Tradition applying to a startup-culture employer creates a predictable mismatch — Hogan data makes this visible early.
- Development planning: In development programmes (not hiring), all three instruments together form the basis of a coaching conversation about performance strengths, derailment risks, and motivational alignment.
How to Approach Hogan Questionnaires
Unlike aptitude tests, you cannot "prepare" for Hogan personality instruments in the sense of studying correct answers. But there are meaningful ways to approach them that improve the quality and authenticity of your results.
- Don't try to construct an "ideal" profile: Hogan instruments — especially the HPI with 206 items — are designed to detect response distortion (extreme social desirability bias). Attempting to fake extreme Adjustment and Prudence while deflating Excitable and Mischievous will create an implausible pattern. Assessors who read Hogan reports are trained to identify this.
- Answer for "typical you" not "best-case you": The HPI instructions specifically ask how you typically behave. If you sometimes get impatient under pressure, don't mark False on every Excitable item. Hogan's validity depends on accurately capturing your typical self, not your ideal self.
- Be consistent: Because Hogan items are semantically similar across the scale, inconsistency within a scale is flagged by the algorithm. If you answer True to "I rarely lose my temper" but also True to "I get frustrated when things go wrong," this inconsistency reduces scale reliability.
- Know your MVPI before the process: Reflect genuinely on what you value in work environments — autonomy vs structure, money vs impact, stability vs change. These are things you know about yourself. Answering MVPI items quickly and authentically produces a more accurate and useful profile than overthinking.
- Use the HDS for self-awareness: Before sitting a Hogan assessment, it's worth reading the 11 HDS scales and honestly considering which 2–3 might apply to you under stress. This self-knowledge isn't about faking — it's about being prepared for debrief conversations and interview questions that may probe these areas.
Frequently Asked Questions
Preparing for an Assessment That Includes Personality Questionnaires?
Build your aptitude test skills alongside your personality questionnaire preparation. Strong cognitive scores reinforce your personality profile.